Download PGN of November ’25 Daring Defences games
>> Previous Update >>
London vs Dutch Defence 2 Bf4 Nf6 3 e3 g6 4 h4 [A80]
The London System has always been very popular, and Paravyan used a crafty move order in this game. As we will see it is important for Black to play 3...e6 rather than 3...g6?!:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
However, Black was soon on top in Paravyan, D - Carlsen, M.
Dutch Defence 2 Bg5 h6 3 Bh4 g5 [A80]
2 Bg5!? has always been a move that worried me.In Terry, R - Carlsen, M Magnus goes for the critical idea of playing ...h6 and ...g5 which can lead to sharp and interesting play:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As we will see though, Black still has some issues to overcome. 7 Be2! instead of 7 hxg5 looks critical, and the queen's knight is much better placed on c3 than d2.
London vs Dutch Defence 2 Bf4 Nf6 3 h3 b6 4 g4 [A80]
It was quite a shock to face Magnus in Titled Tuesday, but I missed a chance to gain a good opening position after 7...Nc6?!:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In this position I should have played 8 gxf5!, see Williams, S - Carlsen, M.
Exchange Grünfeld 7 Bc4 0-0 8 Ne2 c5 9 0-0 Nc6 10 Be3 Na5 [D87]
A rather critical line of the Grünfeld. It seems that Sam forgot his theory in Firouzja, A - Shankland, S after 15 Bxb6:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Instead of playing 15...Qc8?!, 15...Qd7! is a superior move that leads to equality.
Exchange Grünfeld 8.Bb5+ Nc6 9.0-0 0-0 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Qc2 cxd4 [D85]
In Dubov, D - Shankland, S Dubov plays a line that should be equal with correct play, but Black is in more danger than White, due to his slightly weakened kingside:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There are some interesting new ideas that White could try on move 18, mainly my favourite push 18 h4!?
English Defence: 3 e4 Bb7 4 Nc3 Bb4 5 Ne2 [A40]
5 Nge2!? is a modern idea that some engines have suggested:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It certainly seems like a good way for White to play, if White is happy to sacrifice a pawn for the initiative. In Csonka, B - Korobov, A the critical try would be 10 Be2 instead of 10 Nb5!?
Benko Gambit Declined 4 g4 [A57]
4 g4!? is an idea that could certainly shock Black:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And as we will see in the short game Zhao, E - Hercegovac, N Black has to be very careful to pick the correct response..
Till next month, Simon
>> Previous Update >>
If you have any questions, either leave a message on the Daring Defences Forum, or subscribers can email me at support@chesspublishing.com.












